WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS GUY?!

I’ve often asked about Barack Obama the question, “What’s wrong with this guy? Why is it that every policy measure, everything he seems to support and promote, and every law he signs is detrimental to our liberty, our sovereignty, and our national interests? Is he so incompetent that he just doesn’t know what he is doing? Or is he keenly aware of what he is doing and the role he must play in order to further this agenda which three years later is evident are no good for this nation?

In the Bible, the Books of First and Second Chronicles and First and Second Kings record for US the deeds and misdeeds of the temporal kings of Israel and Judah and how G-d dealt with the nation and its rulers, including the nations surrounding Israel. More of this history can be read in books such as Jeremiah, Isaiah, and the prophetic books of the Bible. It is my personal and firm belief that the leaders of the nations of the earth to this day do either "good" or "evil" in the sight of the Lord, and some day when the Books are opened, they will have to account for the policies they enacted as leaders of their nations. As it was then, so it is now, and so it shall be until the time of the end.

When evil leaders do evil things in spite of the laws of that land, it is not the nation who is at fault but the leaders themselves, and because of their misdeeds the nation suffers. The United States of America, like all of the nations around it, and every nation, empire and civilization that has ever existed, will someday render an account to G-d for its deeds and for its misdeeds. Many of America's leaders themselves did "good in the sight of the Lord' in their day, and many "did evil in the sight of the Lord," and this has held true even to this very day, and will be as long as there is a country named the United States of America. The mistake that too many of US have made is to blur the misdeeds of past American leaders who "did evil in the sight of the Lord" as being synonymous with this nation and its finest traditions. This is the world view of the Marxist and it is how Obama and those of his ideological bent see this country and its mixed history of good and evil. They believe that the misdeeds of some of its leaders is synonymous with the nation and its institutions itself.

This has been exploited by Marxists as a tool to foster a type of resentment in today's inner city youths towards this society and nation in general and traditional Judeo-Christian values and mores in particular. Understanding this goes a long way in understanding how some communities who have historically been socially conservative, nevertheless have elected America's most liberal politicians to office.

Liberation Theology, and its offshoot – Black Liberation Theology – and multiculturalism, and the doctrine of ethno-centrism have created a false view of America which has resulted in a type of balkanization of its diverse ethnic groups, and rather than bring them all together, as was the case in times past into the greater American Identity, it has created a separation of sorts along racial, ethnic, economic, class, and along national boundaries, where today, diverse interests threaten to unravel the very social fabric of this republic. This is one of the primary reasons why there are so many competing lobbying groups in Washington, D.C., and why so many foreign interests are working within the halls of congress upon our elected representatives to promote causes, funding, and legislation which are not necessarily in this country's best interests or the interests of its people.

The current occupant of the Oval Office was a member for twenty years of a church in Chicago that preaches Black Liberation Theology, teaches Anti-Semitism, and promotes Communist organizations and causes through community organizations such as ACORN, and he was active in activities with this church and these organizations for many years as a local neighborhood community organizer (agitator and revolutionary) before he delved into politics, but once he entered politics, he did not break with the radical elements and leaders he had developed deep personal ties with over a span of twenty years or more; but continued to use these in his rise up the political ladder of the newly radicalized Democratic Party which the Clintons by then had taken over with their vast network of 60s radicals who now ran the party. Thus it is with this background and activities tied to various interlocking organizations such as liberal the Tides Foundation, and individuals like the billionaire Marxist George Soros, that compels US to ask the following of President Barack Hussein Obama.

What lies at the heart of a leader when the decisions he makes with regards to the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq, and before the successful end of both wars; decides to unilaterally to drop the War on Terror before a declaration of victory is made over an enemy this country is still at war with?

What are we to make for example, of the president's decision through his Attorney General - Erick Holder - of bringing several of the 9/11 terrorists to NYC, including the Al Qaeda leader, Khalid Sheik Mohammed in order to try them in civil court, rather than trying them in military tribunals?

What motivates this president and his Attorney General to give foreign born non-citizen terrorists and enemy combatants rights they are not given under the Constitution of the United States?

Why is this president rushing to try as criminals law enforcement and intelligence officials of this government, who served this country with distinction in the previous administration? Even exposing them, their families, and their counterparts now serving in the field to exposure, and disclosing how the United States collects and gathers intelligence?

What is at the heart of the president's inability to make a military decision in wartime with regards to troop deployment to Afghanistan some four months after his leading Commander in the field requested an increase in troop assignments, and told him in no uncertain terms to give "US at least forty-thousand more troops or risk mission failure?"

By what sophistry of reason does this president conclude that the tragic incident at Fort Hood might not have been an act of Islamist terrorism when Army Major Hassan had for months given signs that he had been radicalized and had even attempted several times to contact Al Qaeda?

How can the president believe that the first act of terrorism on United States soil in eight years had been anything but an act of pre-meditated terrorism?

And why is he so cautious about Islamists while being quick to call as "stupid" a local police officer's arrest of an offending race bater who went out of his way to be offensive to the law enforcement official?

What motivates the president to close the most secure maximum security prison in the world and move its occupants who are amongst the world's most dangerous and motivated enemies of this country, into the continental United States, when there is absolutely no need to subject the American mainland and its population to this danger, especially in light of the fact that this president swore to defend and protect it precisely from such dangers foreign and domestic?

What motivated this president to order the FBI to discontinue its surveillance of foreign Islamist groups in the US with ties to terror organizations outside of this country?

Why has this president abandoned Iranian pro-democratic movements within Iran, while pulling all of the stops on behalf of a Marxist Honduran politician seeking to extend his presidency indefinitely by changing his country's Constitution?

What motivates this president to alienate allies such as Israel while making overtures of friendship with enemy despotic regimes such as Cuba, Venezuela, and Iran?

And why did he authorize almost a billion dollars in aid to Hamas, a terrorist entity and sworn enemy of this country's ally, Israel, that shoots missiles into Israeli cities with impunity? What would we demand our leaders do if the same were happening to US here? Why is he quick to condemn and criticize Israel when it takes measures to protect its Jewish and Arab civilian population from terrorism?

Why does this president travel extensively abroad to speak from those nations against his own country by apologizing on behalf of it for wrongs he claims it committed against them in the past?
What motivates this president to sign international agreements which subjugate the sovereignty of this nation and the Constitutional rights of its citizens to unelected tribunals, councils, and ministries, especially without congressional oversight?

What kept this president from participating as the leader of the free world in Germany's 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall; perhaps one of history's most significant moments and one which signaled the start of the fall of the Soviet Union? Only to see him a week later, travel to the Far East?

The answer to these questions are part of a multi-layered ideologically based world view that has rendered this president and every member of his team dangerously inept and unable to perform the leadership requirements which their respective positions demand of them to meet in order to keep this country safe and to bring the War on Terror to a successful close in the coming years.

When ideology trumps reasoned and seasoned leadership, what results is nothing short of chaos; chaos on so many levels that it renders the person or persons who make them unable to understand the consequences of their well meaning but highly misguided policy decisions.

Lives are ruined and destroyed by such decisions. Nations fall by such decisions. And American life in war is needlessly shortchanged by men who makes such decisions. And such is the current occupant of the White House - Barak Hussein Obama and every person who serves under him as part of his team.

What we are witness to now is the result of a junior senator with no foreign policy experience, no experience outside of his district, and hardly any time having served as a US Senator to have been thrust to the most powerful and most influential, and important executive position on the planet, and then watch as he applies policies based upon a discredited ideology and world view upon the American domestic and foreign areas. This is nothing short than having put a person who is not qualified to do work he is not fit to do, and has no experience in; and then expect success. Barak Hussein Obama and his people - those Marxist ideologues and theorists he's surrounded himself with are out of their league, and we and the world are the worst for it.

Remember that by their fruits you shall know them. Listen closely to what Obama says, and especially look at what he does. Then observe where he goes with it. Afterwards keep a close eye on whom he meets, and how he comports himself, and again how he represents US. Then you will see a pattern. I have often wondered and have been very concerned that the United States of America is not mentioned in Biblical Prophecy. At least not on the surface, and there has yet to be someone who can decipher the Bible Codes to see what will befall the United States and why it is not mentioned in Scripture. If indeed the United States is going to lose its status as a world power or cease to be when the prophetic timeline winds down and the end times overtake the events now before US, the conceivable way that I can envision it happening would be that such an event is going to be preceded by the policies and directives of a weak and vacillating chief executive whose inexperienced and intransigent ideology would empower America’s enemies (foreign and domestic) while diminishing America’s role in the world. Barack Obama is such a man.

Barak Hussein Obama is a man who is bound by an irrepressible ego and stifling ideology and world view, the combination of which will be his undoing, because it limits him to predictable actions and reactions which this country's enemies can use against him and US. Thus, we see what these can do to a man in the face of various crisis which have overtaken the world during his presidency and how has been incapable of decisive leadership – dithering between vacillation and indecision – or implementing harmful policies such as his illegal moratorium over private industry to drill for the vast oil reserves this nation has and get US out of dependence of OPEC for our energy needs and their domination of our economy through oil, and the president’s policy towards terrorism and the growing instability overrunning Arab nations in the Middle East which if not monitored and balanced, and controlled, could result in the first modern Muslim Caliphate spanning half of the globe and putting in danger longtime American allies in those areas.

Without a doubt the president’s policies and agenda have proven extremely harmful and has damaged America’s leadership role in the world. Unfortunately, if Obama is not stopped and his policies reversed, it may also prove to be our undoing as well. Obama is nothing more than a good public speaker, one on par with Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, but a terrible wartime president. His is the classic example that good politicians do not necessarily make good leaders. Between the two is a universe, and there are few, such as Dwight David Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, and Ronald Wilson Reagan, who can successfully navigate it.