WHAT TO LOOK FOR IF THE DEMOCRATS GET YOUR VOTE

PART THREE

Ø  Joe Biden will most assuredly cut police funding across the country by withholding federal aid to the states of his choosing.  Is this charge true?  Joe Biden and his handlers and supporters claim that he does not support defunding the police.  But what they claim is not what they say they support.  When asked about defunding the police, their presumptive candidate for president, said otherwise; in a Now This interview with activist Ady Barkan, Biden told his interviewer that police forces do not need surplus military equipment because, according to Biden, this is what leads them to “become the enemy” in a community.  When Barkan asked Biden, “But do we agree that we can redirect some of the [police] funding?”  Biden’s answer was even more revelatory; his reply was, “Yes, absolutely.”

By his own admission, in his own words, Jose Biden supports defunding the police in order to reallocate or redirect city funds into other city budgets.  Moving a fund from the city’s police budget to another is defunding the police budget, because the money is removed from its budget and placed in another’s.

This is defunding; this is redirecting, this is reallocating.  Choose any word to describe what is being proposed by Mr. Biden and his party; in the simplest terms, it is defunding by any other name.  Not only will Democrat Party mayors and their candidate for president slash funding for police departments across the country, their policies, statements, and actions bear witness that they consider rioters, looters, violent mobs “peaceful protestors” and have excused and justified occupations of Seattle and Portland, and consider their own law enforcement “the enemy” as they have federal law enforcement officers, disparagingly calling them:”storm troopers, Trump’s troops, and Nazis.”

Whether Democrat mayors choose to redirect, redistribute, or to reallocate funds; they will defund your police force and slash their budgets, and curtail their ability to serve and protect your communities across the country.  They’ve done it in NYC; they’ve done it in Minneapolis; they’ve done it in Seattle, and they’ll do it where you live, if you elect them to office. 

  Ø  Democrat mayors in over a dozen cities across the nation have displayed reluctance to condemn organized mob violence in their cities.  They have done this by policy and by speech their support for the mobs pillaging their cities and rioting against their communities, while ordering their local police forces to “stand down” and do nothing, but allow the looters, the arsonists, the rioting anarchists and militant radicals to beat people, destroy private and public properties, and assault the local police as they stand by rendered impotent by order of their mayors and police council members.  Some Democrat mayors have come out on the side of the mobs victimizing their communities.  These far Left Democrats have accused President Trump for the violence, but everyone knows that the violence has lasted long before he dispatched federal law enforcement officials to the area; in fact, these violent riots have been occurring in Portland, Oregon for over sixty days.

As a matter of fact, one organization calling itself Occupy Oakland has been involved in protests and civil disobedience since 2011,[1] before Donald Trump took office on January 20^th, 2017.  Many organizations such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the various Occupy movements, and others’ members are rabidly Anti-Semitic, and are part of the BDS movement who promote divestiture from Israel and support for a Palestinian state.

For Democrat mayors of Minneapolis, Minnesota; Washington, D.C.; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; New York City, NY; Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Oakland, California and Chicago, Illinois to blame Trump for the riots absurd and unfair because, like everything else they say about Trump, it has no basis in either truth or reality.

For example, their claim that law enforcement detachments of several federal agencies protecting federal property provokes the mobs to react and fans the flames of violence in their municipalities is patently absurd and false on the face of the evidence against their claim.

The rioters of Seattle and Portland were in those cities long before federal law enforcement officers were dispatched to those cities to protect federal properties in them, and they have continued in their violent assault against the city’s local police long after the federal law enforcement officers left.

These groups are in these cities to riot and destroy private property, and loot people’s businesses, and torch them.  They are organized, paid, and dispatched to harm law enforcement officers, cause maximum mayhem, chaos, and destruction.  They are in these cities to create the appearance that things have gotten out of control in order to blame on the president.  But the president has nothing to do with their activities, no; they are in these cities to cause as much mayhem against the president and the country.  They need no assistance from anyone to provoke to violence; this is their modus operandi, and they’re getting paid handsomely to organize these riots nationwide set our cities on fire.

  Ø  Take note; Democrats in congress or anywhere else will not criticize the rioting mobs and marauders wreaking havoc across the nation’s inner cities.  When a hearing on Antifa was convened by Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), stormed out in protest against the hearing because she would not condemn Antifa along with the committee.  She did however criticize Senator Cruz and the hearing as she walked out.

There is no parallel to the lawlessness Democrats across the nation have exhibited in the face of such violence against their communities and local law enforcement.  While Senator Hirono did condemn all forms of violent extremism, she did not and would condemn Antifa by name.  Her silence was deafening and her attempt to upstage the hearings by walking on them shows the nation the contempt she has for our country and its law enforcement.  Actions speak louder than words.

Johnathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor and Democrat said that Antifa, is the biggest threat to America's fundamental constitutional right, the freedom of speech.  In his testimony before the hearing, Turley said:

“In my three decades of teaching, I have never seen the level of fear and intimidation that we have today on our campuses,” Turley said in testimony to senators Tuesday. “Many professors are afraid to voice dissenting views of the current protests or other issues out of fear that they could be accused of racism or even physically attacked.”

I would add to that the possibility of being fired from one’s place of employ.  The nation’s campuses and work place have become as polarized as congress.  Anything that a person can say that is considered politically incorrect can get them sued as well.  Turley continues:

“To put it simply, Antifa and these other extremist groups are winning, and few people seem to be taking notice,” he added.[2]  When Turley, a Democrat, says that “few people are taking notice” of the mayhem and destruction of private property and the deaths across the country, who do you think he is referring to?  Answer: the party he is a member of; the Democratic Party.

  Ø  The Democrats will disarm every citizen and annul their first amendment rights guaranteed to them by law, effectively leaving law abiding gun owners and everyone else at the mercy of criminals across America.  The Democrats have been for decades behind creative legislative efforts to annul the Second Amendment to the Constitution, because it protects every citizen’s right to keep and bear arms and to defend home and country in the nation’s militia, which today is each state’s National Guard and Reserves.

The reasoning behind this effort is to enact gun legislation which systematically removes this right under this amendment piecemeal through progressive anti-gun laws; first against what its proponents call “assault weapons” such as the AR-15 Rifle and the AK-47 Rifle and others like these two of differing brands and models.[3]  It is ironic that while they seek to disarm you and restrict and remove your right to self-defense of life, limb, and property from dangerous criminals, they have taken this lawlessness to another level.

  Ø  The Democrats are now releasing dangerous hardened criminals and felons across the country from jails under their jurisdiction,[4] and are planning to release more into the nation’s communities if they retain power in Washington come this elections.  This effects of this lawless policy is being seen and felt across the country, as dangerous criminals are preying on the communities they have been released to, and the people of those communities are being terrorized into submission by them as they stand defenseless against them, because the Democrat mayors of those cities do absolutely nothing about it.

As lifetime criminals, felons and rapists are released into every community to terrorize and endanger a defenseless and unarmed citizenry, gang bangers roam our neighborhoods and streets.  They have already disarmed law abiding citizens, and defunded their police, now they are releasing the most dangerous people into unsuspecting neighborhoods whom these Democrat politicians have left defenseless for them to prey on.  But it doesn’t end there.

  Ø  The Democrats have vowed time and again, “We will take your fire arms,” indeed, Texas Democrat and former candidate for president, Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke, told his audience, “We will take your guns.”[5]  The cat is out of the hat now; and Democrats everywhere are brandishing the Anti-gun agenda full speed ahead in their quest to disarm law abiding citizens.  Ironically, it is these states that have witnessed the worst rioting in years, and continue to do so.  What’s in common with all of them?  They are all Democrat-Controlled cities, townships and municipalities.

Years ago the state of New Jersey; under the governorship of Democrat Joe Florio, convinced his state legislature to make owning AR-15s illegal, and by a stroke of his pen signed the legislature into law and made everyone in his state who owned one of these rifles a felon.  He did not seek their opinion, but signed conceived a law that overnight criminalized owning an AR-15 rifle a felony punishable by law.

The New Jersey statute not only outlawed the sale of AR-15 rifles but, unlike a measure approved a year earlier in California, it ordered current owners of assault guns to render them inoperable or sell them.  Jim Florio also raised New Jersey’s taxes.

These two actions and many others are the signature method Democrats use in treating those who elect them to office.  They take away their Second Amendment rights to own their own weapons and to bear them when needed for their own self-defense.  The Second Amendment guarantees every citizen of this country to keep and bear arms for their own so they may hunt for their food, and if necessary, protect their home and communities as citizen militias against enemies foreign or domestic.

If the Democrats are elected to office, they will do this to you and your relatives.  In fact, when asked about his banning AR-15s, he has said he has no regrets for it, and tells his interviewer,    Why?  Because this is one of their goals on the guise of combating what they euphemistically “gun violence,”[6] but in reality is a ploy and excuse to disarm America.

  Ø  The Democrats’ goal is to disarm every US citizen and to prosecute anyone who attempts to keep their firearm.  If anyone attempts to use their firearm in self-defense, they will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law as felons.  On June 28, 2020 in the city of St. Louis, when BLM rioters threatened the home of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, they took a to stand in front of their property to defend it against marauding rioters brandishing their firearms to deter any of the rioters from despoiling their property.

The city’s radical liberal Democrat circuit attorney, Kimberly Garder, condemned the couple while defending the rioting protestors, and sought to bring charges against them instead of the rioters and looters.

But at the time when Patricia McCloskey had brandished her hand gun in order to ward off the rioting demonstrators who by then had congregated on her front lawn, her handgun was inoperable, but the mob gathered in front of their property did not know it at the time.

In order to file charging documents against her, a St. Louis prosecutor ordered the crime lab technicians to reassemble the gun in working order and then attested that it was “readily capable of lethal us.”

 The couple’s attorney, Joe Schwartz commented about this, “It’s disheartening to learn that a law enforcement agency altered evidence in order to prosecute an innocent member of the community.”

“The McCloskeys responded to a June 28 incident during which George Floyd protesters broke into their gated community while attempting to reach the house of St. Louis mayor Lyda Krewson.

 ““The group began yelling obscenities and threats of harm to both victims,” a police report stated.  “When the victims observed multiple subjects who were armed, they then armed themselves and contacted police,”

Missouri attorney general Eric Schmitt has filed to dismiss the case against the couple.[7]

  Ø  The Democrats are working to radically change the demographics of our nation’s suburbs through forced integration of low cost housing from the inner cities into the nation’s suburbs.  This is something where suburbanites must pay close attention, because Joe Biden and the radical Democrats behind him has assuredly promised to reinstate Barack Obama’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) to America’s suburbs if elected to office.

Barack Hussein Obama in 2015 claimed he was fighting “housing segregation” in suburbs, when he issued a regulation known as Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) even though there was a law already on the books, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which outlawed discrimination in the housing industry.

Writing for the Federalist, Shawn Fleetwood writes, “In 2016, Donald Trump won the suburban vote over Hillary Clinton.  Recent polling has shown the incumbent president trailing in the suburbs, however, particularly among women.  If suburban voters knew what Joe Biden has in store for their communities once elected, they might change who they’re willing to cast their ballot for come November.  From here I quote from Mr. Fleetwood’s extremely informative article.

“According to the New York Post, had the regulation been successfully implemented nationwide, localities across the country would have had to ‘scrap zoning, build bigger water and sewer lines to support high-density living, expand schools and social services and add mass transit.  All pushing up local taxes.’  In essence, virtually all control regarding local governance would be outsourced to the federal government.

“Not only has Biden agreed to implement AFFH if elected, but he has also promised to go much further.  Originally, the AFFH rule used HUD grants as a persuasion tactic to bring suburban communities into compliance, while local communities could still make decisions about whether to pursue these grants or retain local zoning control.

“Biden, however, has signed on to a proposal by Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., that would effectively withhold federal transportation grants, used to build and repair highways, unless communities sign on to AFFH.  It would be almost impossible for many communities to decline this funding for critical infrastructure, handing over America’s suburbs to the federal government.

“Stanley Kurtz, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, recently spoke in an interview with Mark Levin about how a Biden presidency would effectively abolish America’s suburbs as we know them.  ‘It would allow bureaucrats in Washington, in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, to control zoning laws, to control the placement of transportation and business districts, even to some degree the drawing of school districts,’ Kurtz said.  ‘In other words, almost every important local governmental responsibility could, under AFFH, fall into the de facto control of the feds.””

“The Trump administration officially discarded the rule in July, arguing the regulation was a blatant power grab by the federal government.  ‘President @realDonaldTrump and I agree that the best run communities are the ones run locally,’ tweeted HUD Secretary Ben Carson.  ‘Today, we are tearing down the Obama Administration’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, which was an overreach of unelected Washington bureaucrats into local communities.”’

“The administration is replacing the Obama-era rule with its own policy, called Preserving Community and Neighborhood Choice.  According to a HUD press release, the new rule ‘defines fair housing broadly to mean housing that, among other attributes, is affordable, safe, decent, free of unlawful discrimination, and accessible under civil rights laws.’  The new regulation also provides more power to local governments with regard to zoning decisions.

“Suburban voters should also know that with AFFH, the crime we routinely see on TV every night, such as the riots in Portland, will likely no longer be exclusive to major cities.  As localities surrounding metropolitan areas begin to be forcibly melted into inner cities, we very well might see city crime begin seeping into once-peaceful suburbs.”

As the projects built under this law come to America’s suburbs, aggravated assaults will shoot up, shootings will shoot up, gang violence will shoot up, rapes and prostitution will come to America’s suburbs, the suburbs will see a rise in carjackings, kidnappings, home invasions, and burglaries as drug addicts, pedophiles, and violent offenders will be unleashed in America’s suburban communities.  Fleetwood continues:

“The very same soft-on-crime policies that have encouraged crime, such as those in New York City, will become the new norm for our suburbs as city police newly encompass suburban police, under worse policies for both.  Following the death of George Floyd, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio slashed the New York Police Department’s budget by more than $1 billion and disbanded the plainclothes anti-crime unit.  Coupled with the state’s new bail-reform laws, the results have been catastrophic.

“According to the Washington Examiner, ‘In one week in July, shootings in the city increased by 176% compared to the same week last year, with 47 shootings reported compared to 17 shootings last year.  Additionally, killings also increased that week, with 14 killed compared to five during the same period in 2019.’   In addition, the month of July marked more shootings in New York City so far this year than in all of 2019.

“If Biden is elected in November, Americans in the suburbs can kiss their peaceful communities goodbye.  Citizens who moved out of the cities hoping to escape violence would be under a Biden administration more likely to be trapped in the same circumstances they fled.

“There’s a reason the Democrats and mainstream media continue to avoid this issue.  If suburban voters begin to understand what Biden’s AFFH rule would mean for their communities, many would flock to Trump, irrespective of what they think of his tweeting habits.  Americans want to live in safe neighborhoods, where their children can go outside and play.  If Trump can campaign effectively on this issue, his chances for reelection will improve dramatically.”[8]

If Biden and his radical Democrat handlers get their way, chaos and lawlessness will place America’s suburbs at the mercy of violent offenders who will prey on them as they now do in America’s inner cities.

  Ø  The Democrats have vowed to have American citizens pay the medical costs of illegal undocumented aliens while the average American struggles to pay their own medical insurance, while those under the Affordable Care Act – otherwise known as Obamacare – have had their medical rates skyrocket beyond their means to be able to pay them.  They have also vowed to replace everyone’s private insurance with a federal one – Obamacare which restricts a patience access to the physician of their choice and replaces them with one the bureaucracy chooses for them, including their medication.  Additionally, they and their RINO colleagues are responsible for raising the cost of medication.  They have pledged that, if elected, they will push this policy and make it the law of the land for every person.  There is no country on the planet that has done this, but the Democrats have promised they will make it law if they are elected to office.

  Ø  The Democrats have promised to eliminate our borders with Canada and Mexico.  They used to oppose this years ago, but because the president opposes it, they have made one of the main official policies of their party.  If they are elected and are successful in doing this, this country will have terrorists and criminals and spies entering at will as often as they please and as many as they wish.  This is a matter of national security, but the Democrats treat it as a human right.  Elimination of borders is one of the key goals of Democrat and Republican globalists in their march to a New World Order.

  Ø  The radical Democrats have succeeded in convincing a sizable number of our youth that their policies are practical and doable, and they are trying to convince you as well.  They are pulling out all of the stops to achieve this, even quoting a beloved comedian, Charlie Chaplin, in one of their commercials, without disclosing that he left America because he was an avowed Socialist.  They will quote his high sounding words in order to convince you that they are on the side of amicable bipartisanship and peaceful coexistence with their political opponents.  Nothing can be further from the truth; in point of fact, if there is anything that one can get from the last four years of their behavior and rhetoric and outbursts is that they are the angriest and most intolerant people on the planet, and wherever they have obtained political power, they have misused it against the populace they govern over.  Be sure they will do it to you wherever you are if you give them the opportunity with your vote.

THE CHOICE BEFORE US COULD NOT BE CLEARER – WE MUST AND MEET THE CHALLENGE BEFORE US

Now to conclude my expose, there is one question that everyone, Democrat, Republican, Independent, or Libertarian should ask themselves before they go out and vote this election, and that question is, “What party would have a purportedly outsider who fancies himself an Independent Marxist Socialist (Communist) as one of its leading contenders for the presidency?”

Why would the Democratic Party allow and even promote a person who presumably is not a Democrat to run as a Democrat, indeed, as one of its two main contenders for president?  We know better, of course.  We know that the other candidates running against him barely made it didn’t make it to the end; one of them – Kamala Harris – folded her campaign in 2019 before the primaries, because she could barely garner even a percent of the Democrat vote.

But, what political party would include Bernie Sanders, a self-avowed Marxist Leninist Socialist as a potential main candidate?  The answer is clear; a party that has embraced the ideology of that candidate and made its official policy promoted by its leadership and the handlers of its leading candidate, Joe Biden.

There has never been a clearer distinction of choices between two candidates for president before the American people as the one the nation faces today for 2020.  One – Donald Trump’s – has almost four years of a clear track record of accomplishments and achievements that has improved the lives of almost every American – achievements and accomplishments never seen before in a single presidency’s first term in office.  Every one of President Donald Trump’s promises has been kept.  And he has done this without any help, but resistance and opposition from the Democratic Party and its media allies.

The other choice the American people have is one of a record of absolutely no achievements to speak for, and in fact, one in which the candidate has spent the better part of forty-four years on the wrong side of every issue that has come before him in his political career.

Even worse, the candidate, Joe Biden, has moved beyond even his own failed politics to embrace the very policies and goals of his Communist competitor for the presidency, Bernie Sanders, and the most radical far Left elements of his party, people like Alexandra Ocasio Cortez, and the squad of Anti American politicians.  To add insult to injury, he has now made far Left radical Kamala Harris his running mate.

If the Democrats get elected, America as we’ve known it will come to an end.  There will be no place to go, no place to flee to, no place to hide on the face of the earth, and as America goes, so goes the world.

The people who currently call themselves Democrats, who have taken the Democratic Party over will impose on this country and its citizen’s policies that mirror those of Communist China, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, North Korea, and every failed imprisoned nation.

If they succeed in getting themselves elected, they will push the nation and the world into a new dark age of tyranny the likes of which has seldom been witnessed.  Like the people of those imprisoned nations who lost their country, we too will lose ours.

We have detailed here what the Democratic Party promises to do to this country if they get elected to office and win the presidency in 2020; what it would do to you and to your family and to your way of life.

The choice will be yours when you enter your voting booth and cast your vote this November – your choice will determine your future and the future of the Republic.  When Benjamin Franklin was asked what type nation the American people had when the United States was established, he answered, “A republic, madame, if you can keep it.”  Will we keep our republic or throw it away with our votes this November?  The answer lies with you and who you choose to vote for.

---

[1] “The Occupy Oakland movement has attracted particularly strong controversy for its tactics.  During protests, police have confiscated knives, scissors, mace, and tear gas, as well as large corrugated metal shields from protesters.  Protesters have also been recorded throwing bottles, metal pipe, rocks, spray cans, improvised explosive devices, and lighting flares at police.  Protesters have slashed tires and invading vacant buildings during protests, and Oakland citizens have expressed concern that the protests have necessitated a large police presence which has made the rest of the city less safe.  Several Occupy organizers and supporters claim that various groups, including some agents provocateurs, infiltrated Occupy Oakland in order to subvert and co-opt the movement, and/or discredit it by causing disruption.  

At an Occupy General Assembly on January 29, protesters expressed a schism in the movement, with some claiming Occupy Oakland had strayed too far from its grassroots ideologies of economic justice, and claiming use of violence was detrimental to the movement in general.  The Occupy Bay Area Jewish Contingent, another Occupy movement, has sought to distance itself from Occupy Oakland, saying it had been "hijacked" by violence.  Members of Occupy Sacramento blamed Occupy Oakland members for at least one incident of violence in their city.”  From Wikipedia, the Online Encyclopedia’s article titled, Occupy Oakland – JB

[2] As quoted in a Fox News August 4^th online article titled Turley explains how Antifa is the 'Keyser Soze' of social unrest – JB

[3] Some states that with a Democrat majority of its legislature, that state’s gun legislation is more restrictive than those where Republicans are the majority.  Antigun laws differ from state to state.  For example, in Texas it is legal to both own and to carry AR-15s and AK-47s from one’s home to the firing range and back, whereas in states where Democrats are the majority, such as New Jersey and New York; it is illegal to own and to carry these two weapons and several others.  The goal of these laws, as claimed by its proponents, is to prevent what they call “gun violence,” with background checks, and restrictions such as the ownership of these weapons.

[4] This is being done under the guise of “protecting” the criminal community from the Communist Chinese Wuhan Corona Virus.  If the virus doesn’t kill you, the criminals will.  You can thank your local Democrat legislature for this – JB

[5] As quoted by Jeff Katz in his article titled Democrats: We Are Coming For Your Guns – JB

[6] “Gun violence” is an absurd term, because it is the person who wields the weapon who shoots it, not the weapon itself.  Anyone can use just about any object as a weapon, but you don’t hear anyone saying, “Let’s outlaw this object or that,” because of its absurdity on its surface. 

[7] From a Newsmax article written by Zachary Evans, titled, Prosecutor Falsely Claimed Patricia McCloskey’s Gun Was Capable of Firing When She Brandished It Outside Her Home – JB

[8] The Federalist, Shawn Fleetwood, How Biden’s Housing Plans Would Destroy America’s Suburbs – JB