WHAT TO LOOK FOR IF THE DEMOCRATS GET YOUR VOTE
PART THREE
Ø Joe Biden
will most assuredly cut police funding across the country by withholding
federal aid to the states of his choosing. Is this charge true? Joe Biden and his handlers and supporters
claim that he does not support defunding the police. But what they claim is not what they say they
support. When asked about defunding the
police, their presumptive candidate for president, said otherwise; in a Now This interview with activist Ady
Barkan, Biden told his interviewer that police forces do not need surplus
military equipment because, according to Biden, this is what leads them to “become the enemy” in a community. When Barkan asked Biden, “But do we agree that we can redirect some of the [police] funding?” Biden’s
answer was even more revelatory; his
reply was, “Yes, absolutely.”
By
his own admission, in his own words, Jose Biden supports defunding the police in
order to reallocate or redirect city funds into other city budgets. Moving a fund from the city’s police budget
to another is defunding the police budget, because the money is removed from its
budget and placed in another’s.
This
is defunding; this is redirecting, this is reallocating. Choose any word to describe what is being
proposed by Mr. Biden and his party; in the simplest terms, it is defunding by
any other name. Not only will Democrat
Party mayors and their candidate for president slash funding for police
departments across the country, their policies, statements, and actions bear
witness that they consider rioters, looters, violent mobs “peaceful protestors” and have excused and justified occupations of
Seattle and Portland, and consider their own law enforcement “the enemy” as they have federal law
enforcement officers, disparagingly calling them:”storm troopers, Trump’s
troops, and Nazis.”
Whether
Democrat mayors choose to redirect, redistribute, or to reallocate funds; they
will defund your police force and slash their budgets, and curtail their
ability to serve and protect your communities across the country. They’ve done it in NYC; they’ve done it in
Minneapolis; they’ve done it in Seattle, and they’ll do it where you live, if
you elect them to office.
Ø Democrat
mayors in over a dozen cities across the nation have displayed reluctance to
condemn organized mob violence in their cities. They have done this by policy and by speech
their support for the mobs pillaging their cities and rioting against their
communities, while ordering their local police forces to “stand down” and do nothing, but allow the looters, the arsonists,
the rioting anarchists and militant radicals to beat people, destroy private
and public properties, and assault the local police as they stand by rendered
impotent by order of their mayors and police council members. Some Democrat mayors have come out on the
side of the mobs victimizing their communities.
These far Left Democrats have accused President Trump for the violence,
but everyone knows that the violence has lasted long before he dispatched
federal law enforcement officials to the area; in fact, these violent riots
have been occurring in Portland, Oregon for over sixty days.
As a matter of fact, one organization
calling itself Occupy Oakland has
been involved in protests and civil disobedience since 2011,[1]
before Donald Trump took office on January 20th, 2017. Many organizations such as Antifa, Black
Lives Matter, the various Occupy movements, and others’ members are rabidly
Anti-Semitic, and are part of the BDS movement who promote divestiture from
Israel and support for a Palestinian state.
For Democrat mayors of Minneapolis,
Minnesota; Washington, D.C.; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; New York City, NY;
Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Oakland, California and Chicago,
Illinois to blame Trump for the riots absurd and unfair because, like
everything else they say about Trump, it has no basis in either truth or
reality.
For example, their claim that law
enforcement detachments of several federal agencies protecting federal property
provokes the mobs to react and fans the flames of violence in their
municipalities is patently absurd and false on the face of the evidence against
their claim.
The rioters of Seattle and Portland were in
those cities long before federal law enforcement officers were dispatched to
those cities to protect federal properties in them, and they have continued in
their violent assault against the city’s local police long after the federal
law enforcement officers left.
These groups are in these cities to riot
and destroy private property, and loot people’s businesses, and torch them. They are organized, paid, and dispatched to
harm law enforcement officers, cause maximum mayhem, chaos, and
destruction. They are in these cities to
create the appearance that things have gotten out of control in order to blame
on the president. But the president has
nothing to do with their activities, no; they are in these cities to cause as
much mayhem against the president and the country. They need no assistance from anyone to
provoke to violence; this is their modus operandi, and they’re getting paid
handsomely to organize these riots nationwide set our cities on fire.
Ø
Take
note; Democrats in congress or anywhere else will not criticize the rioting
mobs and marauders wreaking havoc across the nation’s inner cities. When a hearing on Antifa was convened by
Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), stormed out in
protest against the hearing because she would not condemn Antifa along with the
committee. She did however criticize
Senator Cruz and the hearing as she walked out.
There is no parallel to the lawlessness
Democrats across the nation have exhibited in the face of such violence against
their communities and local law enforcement.
While Senator Hirono did condemn all forms of violent extremism, she did
not and would condemn Antifa by name.
Her silence was deafening and her attempt to upstage the hearings by
walking on them shows the nation the contempt she has for our country and its
law enforcement. Actions speak louder
than words.
Johnathan Turley, a George Washington
University law professor and Democrat said that Antifa, is the biggest threat
to America's fundamental constitutional right, the freedom of speech. In his testimony before the hearing, Turley
said:
“In
my three decades of teaching, I have
never seen the level of fear and intimidation that we have today on our
campuses,” Turley said in testimony to senators Tuesday. “Many professors are afraid to voice
dissenting views of the current protests or other issues out of fear that they
could be accused of racism or even physically attacked.”
I would add to that the possibility of
being fired from one’s place of employ.
The nation’s campuses and work place have become as polarized as
congress. Anything that a person can say
that is considered politically incorrect can get them sued as well. Turley continues:
“To
put it simply, Antifa and these other
extremist groups are winning, and few
people seem to be taking notice,” he added.[2] When Turley, a Democrat, says that “few
people are taking notice” of the mayhem and destruction of private property and
the deaths across the country, who do you think he is referring to? Answer: the party he is a member of; the
Democratic Party.
Ø
The Democrats
will disarm every citizen and annul their first amendment rights guaranteed to
them by law, effectively leaving law abiding gun owners and everyone else at
the mercy of criminals across America.
The Democrats have been for decades behind creative legislative efforts
to annul the Second Amendment to the Constitution, because it protects every
citizen’s right to keep and bear arms and to defend home and country in the
nation’s militia, which today is each state’s National Guard and Reserves.
The reasoning behind this effort is to
enact gun legislation which systematically removes this right under this
amendment piecemeal through progressive anti-gun laws; first against what its
proponents call “assault weapons”
such as the AR-15 Rifle and the AK-47 Rifle and others like these two of
differing brands and models.[3] It is ironic that while they seek to disarm
you and restrict and remove your right to self-defense of life, limb, and
property from dangerous criminals, they have taken this lawlessness to another
level.
Ø
The
Democrats are now releasing dangerous hardened criminals and felons across the
country from jails under their jurisdiction,[4]
and are planning to release more into the nation’s communities if they retain
power in Washington come this elections.
This effects of this lawless policy is being seen and felt across the
country, as dangerous criminals are preying on the communities they have been
released to, and the people of those communities are being terrorized into
submission by them as they stand defenseless against them, because the Democrat
mayors of those cities do absolutely nothing about it.
As lifetime criminals, felons and rapists
are released into every community to terrorize and endanger a defenseless and
unarmed citizenry, gang bangers roam our neighborhoods and streets. They have already disarmed law abiding
citizens, and defunded their police, now they are releasing the most dangerous
people into unsuspecting neighborhoods whom these Democrat politicians have left
defenseless for them to prey on. But it
doesn’t end there.
Ø
The
Democrats have vowed time and again, “We will take your fire arms,” indeed, Texas Democrat and former candidate for president, Robert Francis “Beto”
O’Rourke, told his audience, “We
will take your guns.”[5] The cat is out of the hat now; and Democrats
everywhere are brandishing the Anti-gun agenda full speed ahead in their quest
to disarm law abiding citizens.
Ironically, it is these states that have witnessed the worst rioting in
years, and continue to do so. What’s in
common with all of them? They are all
Democrat-Controlled cities, townships and municipalities.
Years ago the state of New Jersey; under
the governorship of Democrat Joe Florio, convinced his state legislature to make
owning AR-15s illegal, and by a stroke of his pen signed the legislature into
law and made everyone in his state who owned one of these rifles a felon. He did not seek their opinion, but signed
conceived a law that overnight criminalized owning an AR-15 rifle a felony
punishable by law.
The New Jersey statute not only outlawed
the sale of AR-15 rifles but, unlike a measure approved a year earlier in
California, it ordered current owners of assault guns to render them inoperable
or sell them. Jim Florio also raised New
Jersey’s taxes.
These two actions and many others are the
signature method Democrats use in treating those who elect them to office. They take away their Second Amendment rights
to own their own weapons and to bear them when needed for their own
self-defense. The Second Amendment
guarantees every citizen of this country to keep and bear arms for their own so
they may hunt for their food, and if necessary, protect their home and
communities as citizen militias against enemies foreign or domestic.
If the Democrats are elected to office,
they will do this to you and your relatives.
In fact, when asked about his banning AR-15s, he has said he has no
regrets for it, and tells his interviewer,
Why? Because this is one of their goals on the
guise of combating what they euphemistically “gun violence,”[6]
but in reality is a ploy and excuse to disarm America.
Ø
The
Democrats’ goal is to disarm every US citizen and to prosecute anyone who
attempts to keep their firearm. If
anyone attempts to use their firearm in self-defense, they will be prosecuted
to the fullest extent of the law as felons.
On June 28, 2020 in the city of St. Louis, when BLM rioters threatened
the home of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, they took a to stand in front of their
property to defend it against marauding rioters brandishing their firearms to
deter any of the rioters from despoiling their property.
The city’s radical liberal Democrat circuit
attorney, Kimberly Garder, condemned the couple while defending the rioting
protestors, and sought to bring charges against them instead of the rioters and
looters.
But at the time when Patricia McCloskey had
brandished her hand gun in order to ward off the rioting demonstrators who by
then had congregated on her front lawn, her handgun was inoperable, but the mob
gathered in front of their property did not know it at the time.
In order to file charging documents against
her, a St. Louis prosecutor ordered the crime lab technicians to reassemble the
gun in working order and then attested that it was “readily capable of lethal us.”
The
couple’s attorney, Joe Schwartz commented about this, “It’s disheartening to learn that a law enforcement agency altered
evidence in order to prosecute an innocent member of the community.”
“The McCloskeys responded to a June 28
incident during which George Floyd protesters broke into their gated community
while attempting to reach the house of St. Louis mayor Lyda Krewson.
““The group began yelling obscenities and
threats of harm to both victims,” a police report stated. “When the victims observed multiple subjects
who were armed, they then armed themselves and contacted
police,”
Ø
The
Democrats are working to radically change the demographics of our nation’s
suburbs through forced integration of low cost housing from the inner cities
into the nation’s suburbs. This is
something where suburbanites must pay close attention, because Joe Biden and
the radical Democrats behind him has assuredly promised to reinstate Barack
Obama’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair
Housing (AFFH) to America’s suburbs if elected to office.
Barack Hussein Obama in 2015 claimed he was
fighting “housing segregation” in
suburbs, when he issued a regulation known as Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) even though there was
a law already on the books, the Fair
Housing Act of 1968, which outlawed discrimination in the housing industry.
Writing for the Federalist, Shawn Fleetwood writes, “In 2016, Donald Trump won
the suburban vote over Hillary Clinton. Recent
polling has shown the incumbent president trailing in the suburbs, however,
particularly among women. If suburban
voters knew what Joe Biden has in store for their communities once elected,
they might change who they’re willing to cast their ballot for come November. From here I quote from Mr. Fleetwood’s
extremely informative article.
“According to the New
York Post, had the regulation been successfully implemented nationwide,
localities across the country would have had to ‘scrap zoning, build bigger
water and sewer lines to support high-density living, expand schools and social
services and add mass transit. All pushing
up local taxes.’ In essence, virtually
all control regarding local governance would be outsourced to the federal
government.
“Not only has Biden agreed to implement
AFFH if elected, but he has also promised to go much
further. Originally, the AFFH rule
used HUD grants as a persuasion tactic to bring suburban communities into
compliance, while local communities could still make decisions about whether to
pursue these grants or retain local zoning control.
“Biden, however, has signed on to a
proposal by Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., that would effectively withhold federal
transportation grants, used to build and repair highways, unless communities
sign on to AFFH. It would be almost
impossible for many communities to decline this funding for critical
infrastructure, handing over America’s suburbs to the federal government.
“Stanley Kurtz, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center,
recently spoke in
an interview with Mark Levin about how a Biden presidency would effectively
abolish America’s suburbs as we know them. ‘It
would allow bureaucrats in Washington, in the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, to control zoning laws,
to control the placement of
transportation and business districts, even
to some degree the drawing of school districts,’ Kurtz said. ‘In
other words, almost every important
local governmental responsibility could, under AFFH, fall into the de facto
control of the feds.””
“The Trump administration officially
discarded the rule in July, arguing the regulation was a blatant power grab by
the federal government. ‘President @realDonaldTrump and I agree that
the best run communities are the ones run locally,’ tweeted HUD Secretary
Ben Carson. ‘Today, we are tearing down the Obama Administration’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
rule, which was an overreach of unelected Washington bureaucrats into local
communities.”’
“The administration is replacing the
Obama-era rule with its own policy, called Preserving
Community and Neighborhood Choice. According
to a HUD
press release, the new rule ‘defines
fair housing broadly to mean housing that, among other attributes, is
affordable, safe, decent, free of unlawful discrimination, and accessible under civil rights laws.’ The new regulation also provides more power to
local governments with regard to zoning decisions.
“Suburban voters should also know that with
AFFH, the crime we routinely see on TV every night, such as the riots in
Portland, will likely no longer be exclusive to major cities. As localities surrounding metropolitan areas
begin to be forcibly melted into inner cities, we very well might see city
crime begin seeping into once-peaceful suburbs.”
As the projects built under this law come
to America’s suburbs, aggravated assaults will shoot up, shootings will shoot
up, gang violence will shoot up, rapes and prostitution will come to America’s
suburbs, the suburbs will see a rise in carjackings, kidnappings, home
invasions, and burglaries as drug addicts, pedophiles, and violent offenders
will be unleashed in America’s suburban communities. Fleetwood continues:
“The very same soft-on-crime policies that
have encouraged crime, such as those in New York City, will become the new norm
for our suburbs as city police newly encompass suburban police, under worse
policies for both. Following the death of
George Floyd, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio slashed the New York Police Department’s
budget by more than $1 billion and disbanded the plainclothes anti-crime unit. Coupled with the state’s new bail-reform laws,
the results have been catastrophic.
“According to the Washington
Examiner, ‘In one week in July, shootings in the city increased by 176%
compared to the same week last year, with 47 shootings reported compared to 17
shootings last year. Additionally,
killings also increased that week, with 14 killed compared to five during the
same period in 2019.’ In addition, the month of July marked more
shootings in New York City so far this year than in all of 2019.
“If Biden is elected in November, Americans
in the suburbs can kiss their peaceful communities goodbye. Citizens who moved out of the cities hoping to
escape violence would be under a Biden administration more likely to be trapped
in the same circumstances they fled.
“There’s a reason the Democrats and
mainstream media continue to avoid this issue. If suburban voters begin to understand what
Biden’s AFFH rule would mean for their communities, many would flock to Trump,
irrespective of what they think of his tweeting habits. Americans want to live in safe neighborhoods,
where their children can go outside and play. If Trump can campaign effectively on this
issue, his chances for reelection will improve dramatically.”[8]
If Biden and his radical Democrat handlers
get their way, chaos and lawlessness will place America’s suburbs at the mercy
of violent offenders who will prey on them as they now do in America’s inner
cities.
Ø
The
Democrats have vowed to have American citizens pay the medical costs of illegal
undocumented aliens while the average American struggles to pay their own
medical insurance, while those under the Affordable Care Act – otherwise known
as Obamacare – have had their medical rates skyrocket beyond their means to be
able to pay them. They have also vowed
to replace everyone’s private insurance with a federal one – Obamacare which
restricts a patience access to the physician of their choice and replaces them
with one the bureaucracy chooses for them, including their medication. Additionally, they and their RINO colleagues
are responsible for raising the cost of medication. They have pledged that, if elected, they will
push this policy and make it the law of the land for every person. There is no country on the planet that has
done this, but the Democrats have promised they will make it law if they are
elected to office.
Ø
The
Democrats have promised to eliminate our borders with Canada and
Mexico. They used to oppose this years
ago, but because the president opposes it, they have made one of the main
official policies of their party. If
they are elected and are successful in doing this, this country will have
terrorists and criminals and spies entering at will as often as they please and
as many as they wish. This is a matter
of national security, but the Democrats treat it as a human right. Elimination of borders is one of the key
goals of Democrat and Republican globalists in their march to a New World
Order.
Ø
The
radical Democrats have succeeded in convincing a sizable number of our youth
that their policies are practical and doable, and they are trying to
convince you as well. They are pulling
out all of the stops to achieve this, even quoting a beloved comedian, Charlie
Chaplin, in one of their commercials, without disclosing that he left America
because he was an avowed Socialist. They
will quote his high sounding words in order to convince you that they are on
the side of amicable bipartisanship and peaceful coexistence with their
political opponents. Nothing can be
further from the truth; in point of fact, if there is anything that one can get
from the last four years of their behavior and rhetoric and outbursts is that
they are the angriest and most intolerant people on the planet, and wherever
they have obtained political power, they have misused it against the populace
they govern over. Be sure they will do
it to you wherever you are if you give them the opportunity with your vote.
THE CHOICE BEFORE US COULD NOT BE CLEARER – WE MUST AND MEET THE
CHALLENGE BEFORE US
Now to conclude my expose, there is one question that
everyone, Democrat, Republican, Independent, or Libertarian should ask
themselves before they go out and vote this election, and that question is, “What party would have a purportedly outsider
who fancies himself an Independent Marxist Socialist (Communist) as one of its
leading contenders for the presidency?”
Why would the Democratic Party allow and even promote a
person who presumably is not a Democrat to run as a Democrat, indeed, as one of
its two main contenders for president?
We know better, of course. We
know that the other candidates running against him barely made it didn’t make
it to the end; one of them – Kamala Harris – folded her campaign in 2019 before
the primaries, because she could barely garner even a percent of the Democrat
vote.
But, what political party would include Bernie Sanders, a
self-avowed Marxist Leninist Socialist as a potential main candidate? The answer is clear; a party that has
embraced the ideology of that candidate and made its official policy promoted
by its leadership and the handlers of its leading candidate, Joe Biden.
There has never been a clearer distinction of choices
between two candidates for president before the American people as the one the
nation faces today for 2020. One –
Donald Trump’s – has almost four years of a clear track record of
accomplishments and achievements that has improved the lives of almost every
American – achievements and accomplishments never seen before in a single
presidency’s first term in office. Every
one of President Donald Trump’s promises has been kept. And he has done this without any help, but
resistance and opposition from the Democratic Party and its media allies.
The other choice the American people have is one of a record
of absolutely no achievements to speak for, and in fact, one in which the
candidate has spent the better part of forty-four years on the wrong side of
every issue that has come before him in his political career.
Even worse, the candidate, Joe Biden, has moved beyond even
his own failed politics to embrace the very policies and goals of his Communist
competitor for the presidency, Bernie Sanders, and the most radical far Left
elements of his party, people like Alexandra Ocasio Cortez, and the squad of
Anti American politicians. To add insult
to injury, he has now made far Left radical Kamala Harris his running mate.
If the Democrats get elected, America as we’ve known it will
come to an end. There will be no place
to go, no place to flee to, no place to hide on the face of the earth, and as
America goes, so goes the world.
The people who currently call themselves Democrats, who have
taken the Democratic Party over will impose on this country and its citizen’s
policies that mirror those of Communist China, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua,
North Korea, and every failed imprisoned nation.
If they succeed in getting themselves elected, they will
push the nation and the world into a new dark age of tyranny the likes of which
has seldom been witnessed. Like the
people of those imprisoned nations who lost their country, we too will lose
ours.
We have detailed here what the Democratic Party promises to
do to this country if they get elected to office and win the presidency in
2020; what it would do to you and to your family and to your way of life.
The choice will be yours when you enter your voting booth
and cast your vote this November – your choice will determine your future and
the future of the Republic. When
Benjamin Franklin was asked what type nation the American people had when the
United States was established, he answered, “A republic, madame, if you can keep it.” Will we keep our republic or throw it away
with our votes this November? The answer
lies with you and who you choose to vote for.
[1]
“The Occupy Oakland movement has attracted
particularly strong controversy for its tactics. During protests, police have confiscated
knives, scissors, mace, and tear gas, as well as large corrugated
metal shields from protesters. Protesters have also been recorded throwing
bottles, metal pipe, rocks, spray cans, improvised explosive devices, and lighting flares at police. Protesters have slashed tires and invading
vacant buildings during protests, and Oakland citizens have expressed concern
that the protests have necessitated a large police presence which has made the
rest of the city less safe. Several
Occupy organizers and supporters claim that various groups, including some
agents provocateurs, infiltrated Occupy Oakland in order to subvert and co-opt
the movement, and/or discredit it by causing disruption.
At an Occupy General
Assembly on January 29, protesters expressed a schism in the movement, with
some claiming Occupy Oakland had strayed too far from its grassroots ideologies
of economic justice, and claiming use of violence was detrimental to the
movement in general. The Occupy Bay Area
Jewish Contingent, another Occupy movement, has sought to distance itself from
Occupy Oakland, saying it had been "hijacked"
by violence. Members of Occupy
Sacramento blamed Occupy Oakland members
for at least one incident of violence in their city.” From Wikipedia,
the Online Encyclopedia’s article
titled, Occupy
Oakland – JB
[2]
As quoted in a Fox News August 4th online article titled Turley explains how Antifa is the 'Keyser
Soze' of social unrest – JB
[3]
Some states that with a Democrat majority of its legislature, that state’s gun
legislation is more restrictive than those where Republicans are the
majority. Antigun laws differ from state
to state. For example, in Texas it is
legal to both own and to carry AR-15s and AK-47s from one’s home to the firing
range and back, whereas in states where Democrats are the majority, such as New
Jersey and New York; it is illegal to own and to carry these two weapons and
several others. The goal of these laws,
as claimed by its proponents, is to prevent what they call “gun violence,” with background checks,
and restrictions such as the ownership of these weapons.
[4]
This is being done under the guise of “protecting”
the criminal community from the Communist
Chinese Wuhan Corona Virus. If the
virus doesn’t kill you, the criminals will.
You can thank your local Democrat legislature for this – JB
[6]
“Gun violence” is an absurd term, because it is the person who wields the
weapon who shoots it, not the weapon itself.
Anyone can use just about any object as a weapon, but you don’t hear
anyone saying, “Let’s outlaw this object
or that,” because of its absurdity on its surface.
[7]
From a Newsmax article written by
Zachary Evans, titled, Prosecutor Falsely Claimed Patricia
McCloskey’s Gun Was Capable of Firing When She Brandished It Outside Her Home
– JB
