Call it a New International Order, or a New World Order; both are part of the same rhetoric and the same mindset that has beset Republican and Democrat politicians in the White House for quite some time, with the exception of President Reagan who was a staunch believer in American Exceptionalism – a firm conviction that the United States of America has a unique role given to it by Divine Providence which it must keep, and that in order to fulfill this role and preserve the delicate balance of liberty and prosperity while keeping the peace, it is incumbent upon itself that it preserve also its independence and not get entangled in the affairs of foreign governments, especially where such entanglements require that it give up parts of its sovereignty, much less its complete sovereignty.
Successive American presidents from both political parties have saddled the nation’s interests with those of other nations, interests which have worked to erode this nation’s independence, making it interdependent with nations that do not necessarily have this nation’s interests at heart. As if this weren’t bad enough, these globalist politicians whose oath to our Constitution has proven meaningless, continue with multilateral negotiations with the globalist heads of other nations in search of ways and means to bringing about a New World Order. And they mean to keep it.
Thus we heard on the heels of military victory over Iraq at the end of Operation Desert Storm, President George H.W. Bush, once a head of the secretive Council On Foreign Relations, and a member of the Trilateral Commission, telling US that America and the world were embarking on an era which would usher in a “New World Order.” His successor, William Jefferson Clinton, perhaps one of the most corrupt presidents this nation has ever had in office; also continued to lay the foundations for this New World Order, as did his successor during his second term in office, George W. Bush.
And now we see the current occupant of the White House, Barack Hussein Obama, himself boldly tell the graduating Class of 2010 at West Point that he seeks the establishment of a New International Order, and to that end he is doing all that he can to bring it about before the end of his first term, since at least at this writing it is questionable whether or not he will serve a second term, though things have a way of changing for politicians with time, and Obama is no exception to this rule, so don’t count him out yet.
But, it is interesting that while former presidents who were members of the secretive Council on Foreign Relations, and or the Trilateral Commission; both globalist organizations committed to the continued establishment of policies and treaties which erode American sovereignty and strengthen international ties along economic and political lines; only in the last twenty years have they become confident in their enterprises to speak of their endeavors publicly. This indicates that they are so far along and believe that society is so permeated with like-minded individuals now in places of power and influence across the broad strata of culture and commerce, religion and ideas, education and information; that can boldly speak of what was once unspeakable in public, the New World Order, or as Barack Obama calls it, a New International Order.
There is enough going on in the world of cross-national commerce, diplomacy, science, finance, and every other enterprise that there is no need to look for conspiracies under every bed; it’s here, and it is moving at an incredible pace. Evidence of it is the Global Warming/Climate Change being promoted not just by environmentalists, but by captains of industry, politicians, film stars, educators, and almost all of the giants of the technology industry, including Exxon-Mobile, PSE&G, Michigan Power and Light, Consolidated Edison, and educational channels such as the Discovery Channel and A&E. They’ve tipped their hand, because it would have been more credible of them if they had presented those who support and those who oppose the claims of the Global Warming/Climate Change crowd; but instead they’ve all decided to climb on to Al Gore’s bandwagon and take a stake in the coming multi-trillion dollar international tax and regulate scam which governments – including this one under the current president – will force down the throats of their electorates and constituents, just as congress followed the lead of this president and rammed a two thousand page health care bill down the collective throats of a nation without knowing what was in it, and with the knowledge that it would bankrupt it once and for all time when it takes affect some four years from its passage. They don’t have to worry about backlash, you see, many of them have opted not to run for reelection, and have chosen a nice retirement for themselves. They won’t be affected by it since they and this president and successive presidents will be exempt from it. Only the American people will be affected by this law; a law that congress would not place on itself. But the law will serve the New International World Order because it will effectively impoverish American industry and small and medium businesses, not to mention raise the costs of health care beyond anything that the free market would have accomplished had the law not been passed.
The point that must be taken is that America is on the brink of change its people did not anticipate when fifty-two per cent of those who voted in 2008 for “change,” rejecting – or so they thought at the time – “four more years of George Bush.” Whether true or not, and arguments can be made that President Bush’s second term in office did not offer much differences with regards to rogue states like North Korea, Syria, Libya, Iran and its nuclear program, bilateral relations with a resurgent and imperialist Russia, the limited war being fought in Afghanistan against a resurgent and resupplied (Iran) Taliban, and the bailout of Wall Street at Main Street’s expense, and waste and fraud in government spending at levels never before seen in the history of this nation.
But, sensing the deep desire of the American electorate for real and substantive change in the way that Washington does its work, the end of all corruption in high places, the end of sweat hear deals, cronyism, payoffs, favoritism, control of key committees by any one party, and the excrement throwing destructive political climate the Clintons had brought to Washington and made a staple there and across much of the country; the end to all of these was the change that the American electorate wanted, and sought in Barack Obama, but it is not the change they got.
They did not know, nor were they going to listen to anyone warning them of Obama’s radical Marxist past; his associations with the most militant and radical elements of our society; his lifelong involvement in Communist front groups and projects, the Communist power brokers and machine politicians who helped catapult him onto the national stage; his own statements in interviews made long before he was known, where he promotes Marxist ideas and thinking with regards to the Supreme Court, and our Constitution; his intent to bankrupt the coal industry and every energy provider through Cap and Trade; his desire to establish socialized medicine via universal coverage – what has come to be known as healthcare reform, or ObamaCare. All of these very troublesome details about his life were ignored by those who wanted change, and were spiked by the alphabet soup media that sold out to him almost at the onset.
OBAMA SEEKS A NEW INTERNATIONAL ORDER
Who needs conspiracy theories when everything is out in the open?
"U.S. President Barack Obama told West Point's graduating class Saturday the country must play a leading role in building international alliances.
"The international order we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our times," Obama said, including countering violent extremism and insurgency, stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and securing nuclear materials, preventing conflict, helping poor countries feed themselves and care for their sick and fighting global warming.
"If we are successful in these tasks, that will lessen conflicts around the world," the president told about 20,000 people at the academy, on the Hudson River north of New York City. "It will be supportive of our efforts by our military to secure our country. We must pursue a strategy of national renewal and global leadership."
And now we see another of Obama’s choices for the Supreme Court whose radical credentials are beyond reproach, if you are a radical looking for a like-minded fellow radical to fill the soon to become vacant seat of Justice John Paul Stevens. In order to underscore just what Obama’s intent is with regards to his change that you can believe in, one must go back to an interview he had years ago where he made the following statements:
"If you look at the victories and failures of the civil-rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order; as long as I could pay for it I'd be OK.
"But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in the society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and [the] Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted – and one of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil-rights movement was because the civil-rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that."
How does this serve the New World Order? Any change that erodes the national Constitution, and the Constitutions of our fifty states, whether small or great, whether by legislation, litigation, or executive order; undermines the very sovereignty of this representative republic, and lays the groundwork for the end of the United States of America as we have come to know it, and worst yet, as our Founders envisioned it to be when they established its laws and bylaws.________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment